Penguatan Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi melalui Mekanisme Pengambilan Keputusan Partisipatif pada Kondisi Keterbatasan Akses (Studi Kasus Daerah 3T)
Keywords:
Akuntabilitas Transparansi Pengambilan Keputusan Partisipatif Tata Kelola Daerah 3TAbstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pentingnya penguatan akuntabilitas dan transparansi dalam tata kelola kelembagaan, khususnya pada wilayah tertinggal, terdepan, dan terluar (3T) yang menghadapi keterbatasan akses infrastruktur, informasi, dan komunikasi. Kondisi tersebut seringkali mempengaruhi efektivitas proses pengambilan keputusan dan keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan dalam tata kelola institusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran mekanisme pengambilan keputusan partisipatif dalam memperkuat akuntabilitas dan transparansi pada kondisi keterbatasan akses. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan analisis dokumen, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitik untuk mengidentifikasi pola partisipasi pemangku kepentingan dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme pengambilan keputusan partisipatif melalui forum musyawarah, keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan, serta keterbukaan informasi mampu meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas kelembagaan. Selain itu, penerapan monitoring dan evaluasi sederhana yang disesuaikan dengan kondisi wilayah 3T memperkuat kontrol sosial dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap institusi. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan tata kelola partisipatif yang adaptif terhadap keterbatasan akses dapat menjadi strategi efektif dalam memperkuat akuntabilitas dan transparansi kelembagaan di wilayah 3T.
Downloads
References
Abdu, A. A., Chambers, L. M., Mulligan, D. K., & Jacobs, A. Z. (2024). Algorithmic transparency and participation through the handoff lens: Lessons from the U.S. Census Bureau’s adoption of differential privacy. arXiv https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3658962
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582682_4
Ballari, D., Siabato, W., Claramunt, C., Mata, F., Zagal, R., & Franco, R. (2025). On the development of open geographical data infrastructures in Latin America: Progress and challenges. arXiv https://doi.org/10.5311/josis.2025.30.364
Birdayanthi, B., Yusriadi, Y., & Ikmal, I. (2024). Accountability and transparency in public administration for improved service delivery. Journal Social Civilecial https://doi.org/10.29103/ijpas.v3i2.13890
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447– 468 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector collaborations. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663 https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802823.n12
Dwitasari, K. A. (2024). Mengkaji perkembangan partisipasi warga negara dalam tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 2(2), 15– 24 https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v2i2.1072
Denzin, N. K. (2012). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247648.n30
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
Florini, A. (2007). The right to know: Transparency for an open world. Columbia University Press. Memuat sumber-sumber yang diacu di dalam penulisan artikel. Derajat kemutakhiran bahan yang diacu pada rentang 10 tahun terakhir. Daftar jumlah rujukan diharapkan 80% sumber primer yang berasal dari artikel riset nasional dan internasional. Minimal 15 referensi.
Fox, J. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522.
Gantika, S. (2023). Transformasi digital: Meningkatkan transparansi dan partisipasi dalam administrasi publik. Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting (COSTING).
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2014). The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of government. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 137–143.
Hood, C. (2010). Accountability and transparency. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 989–1006.
Irawati, S., Hayat, A., Juniar, A., & Handayani, S. A. (2023). Exploring accountability and transparency in government agency management: A literature review. Ilomata International Journal of Management.
Joshi, A., & Houtzager, P. (2012). Widgets or watchdogs? Public Management Review, 14(2), 145– 162.
Jayanti, N. W. D. B. (2023). Urgensi partisipasi masyarakat dalam public governance di Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Public Administration.
Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 429–439.
Meijer, A., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29.
Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.
Nurmalasyiah. (2023). The influence of participatory leadership and budget transparency on public service accountability with community involvement as an intervening variable. International Journal of Humanity Advance, Business & Sciences.
OECD. (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Publishing.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
Puangrimaggalatung, Z., & Amika, Z. R. (2025). Explaining public service quality at the village level: Administrative capacity, transparency, digitalization, and citizen participation. PUBLICUS: Jurnal Administrasi Publik.
Romzek, B., & Dubnick, M. (1987). Accountability in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238.
Samudra, D., Tamamudin, T., & Ayatullah, A. (2025). Innovation digital literacy public administration in Indonesia: National survey data. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia.
Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of accountability. In The Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics. Oxford University Press.
Simanulang, L., & Pramudya, A. (2021). Public service innovation in enhancing government transparency and accountability. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik.
Stoker, G. (2011). Was local governance such a good idea? A global comparative perspective. Public Administration, 89(1), 15–31.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
UNDP. (2015). Governance for sustainable development: Integrating governance in the post-2015 development framework. United Nations Development Programme.
United Nations. (2023). World public sector report 2023: Transforming institutions to achieve the sustainable development goals.
Vrabie, C. (2025). Improving municipal responsiveness through AI-powered image analysis in e- government. arXiv.
World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. World Bank. Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation. Public
Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892.
Downloads
Published
Indexing Check
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rudolf Kempa, Sefanya Sairiltiata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
