Refleksi Metakognitif dalam PAI Berbasis Proyek: Transformasi Deep Learning dan Internalisasi Nilai Islami Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v7i2.3652Keywords:
Metakognisi, Project-Based Learning, PAI, Deep Learning, Internalisasi Nilai IslamAbstract
Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) menghadapi tantangan mendasar dalam memastikan bahwa aktivitas berbasis proyek tidak hanya menghasilkan produk teknis, tetapi juga menginternalisasi nilai-nilai keislaman secara autentik pada diri peserta didik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi mekanisme refleksi metakognitif dan regulasi diri sebagai penggerak utama transformasi surface learning menuju deep learning dalam pembelajaran PAI berbasis proyek (PjBL). Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan desain studi kasus introspektif melalui kerangka practitioner research, data dikumpulkan secara triangulatif dari 41 mahasiswa semester 5 Program Studi PAI UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta melalui kuesioner daring, observasi partisipan, dan analisis dokumen proyek. Hasil penelitian mengidentifikasi tiga mekanisme kunci: (1) interrogasi konseptual, (2) bridging value cognition, dan (3) regulasi kolaboratif. Temuan menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pada komponen evaluasi diri sebesar 39%, serta internalisasi nilai kejujuran (sidq) dan tanggung jawab (amanah) yang lebih kuat dibandingkan nilai-nilai lainnya. Penelitian ini mengajukan Model Integrasi Metakognisi-Nilai (MVIM) sebagai kerangka konseptual yang dapat dioperasionalisasikan dalam pembelajaran PAI berbasis proyek.
Downloads
References
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and Secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC).
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. SAGE Open, 10(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Anderson, G. L., & Herr, K. (1999). The New Paradigm Wars: Is There Room for Rigorous Practitioner Knowledge in Schools and Universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028005012
Azwar, S. (2018). Penyusunan skala psikologi (Edisi ke-2). Pustaka Pelajar.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2004). Research-Based Character Education. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260082
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th ed.) (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-Regulated Learning: Where We Are Today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. Teachers College Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Channa Cook-Harvey, Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for Educational Practice of the Science of Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dennison, G. S. R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dörrenbächer, L., & Perels, F. (2016). Self-Regulated Learning Profiles in College Students. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 229–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.015
Efendi, R., & Yusuf, A. M. (2023). Implementasi Pendekatan Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis Proyek di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2023.121.45-62
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of Metacognition with Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation, and Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Environments. Routledge.
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-Based Learning: A Review of the Literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Krajcik, J., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (n.d.). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. In 1964. McKay.
Lickona, T. (2009). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. Bantam Books.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences in Learning: I. Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 4–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
Mayer, T. (2014). Islam and self-development: Psychological reflections on spirituality in the Quran and Hadith. Revive Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Muhaimin. (2015). Rekonstruksi pendidikan Islam: Dari paradigma pengembangan, manajemen kelembagaan, kurikulum hingga strategi pembelajaran. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Noddings, N. (2002). Educating Moral People: A Caring Alternative to Character Education. Teachers College Press.
Nurlaila, S., & Mujib, A. (2022). Project-Based Learning dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Tinjauan Sistematis terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(321–340). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v11i02.2022
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
Richard M. Ryan, & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Veenman, M. V. J., Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. Van, & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Zeichner, K. M. (2003). Teacher Research as Professional Development for P-12 Educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790300200211
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
Downloads
Published
Indexing Check
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annis sholichah, Eva Latipah, Yuni Sholihah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
